|
Newest Reviews:
New Movies -
These Hammers Don’t Hurt Us
The Myth of the American
Sleepover
On Tour
Horrible Bosses
Senna
Quarantine 2: Terminal
Kidnapped
The Yellow Sea
We Are What We Are
YellowBrickRoad
The Trip
The Borrower Arrietty
Larry Crowne
Old Movies -
Chained for Life
The Baby
My Friend Ivan Lapshin
Someone I Touched
Racing Dreams
In the Gloaming
The Terminal Man
High Tide
Letter to Jane
Amer
Archives -
Recap: 2000,
2001, 2002,
2003, 2004
, 2005, 2006,
2007 , 2008
, 2009 ,
2010 , 2011 ,
2012
All reviews alphabetically
All reviews by star rating
All reviews by release year
Masterpieces
Blog
Screening Log
Links
FAQ
E-mail me
HOME
| |
Theatre of Blood (Douglas Hickox) 1973
Theatre of Blood,
a 1973 Vincent Price horror vehicle, has the distinction of being perhaps the
most critic-proof film ever created. It features Price as Edward Lionheart, a
Shakespearean actor who rises from an apparent death to extract revenge on the
critics’ circle that snubbed him repeatedly in their year-end awards. What
makes these killings deviously clever is that each is a recreation from a murder
in one of the Bard’s plays. It’s a high-concept plot, but it works well, and
keeps the audience from taking the film too seriously (though I doubt the
audience was ever in much danger of that to begin with). The killings are, by
their nature, set pieces, and feel a bit disconnected from each other. Not a lot
of things than happen in the film make a lot of sense. The police are notified,
and place the critics under protection, but time and again Lionheart and his
troupe of homeless miscreants seem to waltz past any security measures. In one
scene, the same decapitated head seems to turn up in two separate places across
London. These killings take up the film’s entirety (there are no lame romantic
subplots or anything like that) and though they are incredibly gory and often
quite elaborate, they are rarely downright scary.
Still, the film manages to feel more like entertainment than a display of
endless torture, since it usually prefers to take the humorous route instead of
the horrific one. The critics are portrayed as a group of erudite eccentric
snobs, and they generally seem to have no concern when their colleagues are
bumped off. The critics continue to criticize Lionheart’s methods of
dispatching them and his method acting, even as they have knives to their
throats. They are caricatures, but fun caricatures. What’s interesting is that
the film seems to hate the pomposity of critics, but at the same time
sympathizes with Lionheart, who obviously places stock in what they say.
Clearly, many directors and actors fine-tune their work based on the responses
of critics. Auteur theory clearly seems to have given modern directors a notion
that they need to place their directorial stamp on a film. It’s good to see a
film that directly addresses the critical / creative relationship, even if it
does so within a hugely exaggerated context. Despite these subtexts, the film is
hugely approachable, and mostly functions on a visceral level. Price has a great
time hamming it up, and even gets to present a few choice scenes from
Shakespeare’s work. The general shoddiness of the film doesn’t matter much. Theater
of Blood is a solid example of a slasher film that is more than the sum of
its parts.
* * *
11-20-01
Jeremy Heilman
|