|
Newest Reviews:
New Movies -
Blind Mountain
Cloverfield
Opium: Diary of a Madwoman
Love and Other Disasters
The Aerial
Madame Tutli-Putli
Joshua
Happiness
Persepolis
Juno
There Will Be Blood
My Blueberry Nights
Charlie Wilson's War
Old Movies -
The Haunted Palace
Everything Will Be Ok
If...
The Tell-Tale Heart
Second Breath
Koko: A Talking Gorilla
Robinson Crusoe on Mars
Song and Solitude
Archives -
Recap: 2000,
2001, 2002,
2003, 2004
, 2005, 2006,
2007
All reviews alphabetically
All reviews by star rating
All reviews by release year
Masterpieces
Screening Log
Links
FAQ
E-mail me
HOME
| |
Blood Simple : Director's Cut (Joel Coen) 2000
The Coen brothers’ first film, Blood Simple has
evidently garnered enough of a following to justify a re-release a mere fifteen
years later. It’s certainly not a bad film, but it’s hardly the classic
reinvention of film noir that it wants to be. This mildly shorter director’s
cut opens with a humorous introduction by a phony film scholar who far
overstates the worth of the film, suggesting the Coens were not entirely
convinced the film warranted another theatrical run.
It’s appropriate that the initials of the film’s title
are B.S., as the film largely works on deception. Although the film is stylishly
directed, it places a lot of emphasis on giving false impressions of what’s
actually going on. There are false scares, deceptive dream sequences, and shots
that conspire to momentarily trick us that the venue of events has shifted.
Barry Sonnenfeld is the D.P., to great effect, and it’s a shame he has chosen
to be a mediocre director instead of a great cinematographer.
Almost everything here feels like a cheat, but since it’s a genre piece
a lot of the stylistic excess can be forgiven.
When that deception filters into the film’s plot, however, I’m less
inclined to be so forgiving. So much of the plot depends on the characters
saying enough to egg each other on, but not saying enough to set the story
straight that credibility is definitely strained at all times.
Still,
a lot of the film’s isolated moments do work. The film is rather
mean-spirited, and that tone fits the proceedings quite well. The Coens don’t
have much in the way of sympathy for any of their characters, and when it’s
over even the survivors of the ordeal aren’t likely to get even a complete
understanding of the chain of events as a reward. The film’s ill will toward
the characters certainly adds a lot to the film’s level of suspense. You
don’t get the impression that any of the characters are safe once the double
crossing begins. The film’s finale is almost the definition of a successful
set piece, and it’s orchestrated with a good deal of suspense. Still, the
majority of the film feels like a parlor trick. Certainly most old film noir
films were not so obvious when telegraphing their plot details. Everything is so
spare here, that when a bonfire is introduced, or a certain line of dialogue is
spoken, you know it’s only a manner of minutes until it shows up again,
slapping you back in the head in case you have forgotten about it. The film is
far from a total miss, but it’s barely a hit since it requires so much sleight
of hand to accomplish what little it manages to accomplish.
***
October, 2001
Jeremy Heilman
|