New Movies -
Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
Old Movies -
Touki Bouki: The Journey of the Hyena
The Strange Affair of Uncle Harry
Recap: 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 , 2005, 2006, 2007 , 2008 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , 2012
Caché (Hidden) (Michael Haneke, 2005)
Caché, Michael Haneke’s latest film is a superb piece of work, made by a master of the form, yet I’m not quite sure how much I actually like it. By design, it’s a purposely-unsatisfying contraption, centered on the French public’s (and government’s) denial of the Algiers atrocities. Beginning with a relatively standard thriller setup (a family receives a mysterious videotape of their own home in the mail with no idea who made it), the director crafts a vicious attack on bourgeois complacency, which he suggests is founded on denial of any political or personal unpleasantness.
There’s a great scene in this film where intellectual family man Georges (Daniel Auteuil) tells his wife (Juliette Binoche) that he’s been withholding his suspicions about the identity of the perpetrator because he didn’t want to upset her. Earlier in the film, the protagonist’s mother doesn’t wish to relive an unpleasant memory of a time when she failed a young orphan. Perhaps most importantly, there’s the bubbling discontent in the couple’s son, who unexpectedly lashes out at his mother. This theme of latent ill will builds gradually, culminating in an ending that sees that sense of calm perhaps irrevocably upended. Appropriately leaving you stranded with a “need to know” that you didn’t posses at the film’s start, watching the movie is ultimately an exercise in frustration. Some viewers have offered hints about the meaning of the final shot, or the identity of a mysterious character that is glimpsed throughout, but since we’re not even certain whether that last shot is being shot from the stalker’s or the director’s camera (the decision to make the long static “video” shots indistinguishable from the rest of the film was a brilliant move by Haneke that creates the paranoia that the protagonists is being watched in each scene), these bits of information only open more lines of questioning.
Caché ‘s brilliant script keeps the audience guessing, deriving its meaning from that open-ended process. Haneke’s method is to use the audience’s knowledge of generic conventions against them in order to create an expectation in the viewer that is never fulfilled. The tantalizing hints that the director gives throughout only further stoke our determination to solve a mystery that may not even have a solution within the film. Furthermore, because the audience is familiar with the way that tensions escalate in thrillers like this, the threat of violence simmers throughout. Caché doesn’t just retard our desires for narrative resolution. It assaults our sense of entitlement regarding on-screen justice with the same gusto with which it attacks its contented principal characters.